<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: We hate our authors, Kasper Hauser&#8217;s Dad, Halstad Blanchard, Ashby Barett, &amp; the Gosford of James.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wehateyourblog.com/we-hate-our-author-kasper-hausers-dad/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wehateyourblog.com</link>
	<description>We hate your blog. We aren&#039;t hard to figure out.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 05:15:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: wehateyourblog</title>
		<link>http://wehateyourblog.com/we-hate-our-author-kasper-hausers-dad/#comment-530</link>
		<dc:creator>wehateyourblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Apr 2010 23:40:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wehateyourblog.wordpress.com/?page_id=15#comment-530</guid>
		<description>From the 1994 Supreme Court Case Campbell v. Acuff-Rose:

&quot;[W]hen there is little or no risk of market substitution...taking parodic aim at an original is a less critical factor in the analysis, and looser forms of parody may be found to be fair use, as may satire with lesser justification for the borrowing than would otherwise be required.&quot;

Thus, if there is little market competition between the satiric version and the original, satire has a much stronger claim to fair use.

We never asked for any money, nor intended to claim financial gain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From the 1994 Supreme Court Case Campbell v. Acuff-Rose:</p>
<p>&#8220;[W]hen there is little or no risk of market substitution&#8230;taking parodic aim at an original is a less critical factor in the analysis, and looser forms of parody may be found to be fair use, as may satire with lesser justification for the borrowing than would otherwise be required.&#8221;</p>
<p>Thus, if there is little market competition between the satiric version and the original, satire has a much stronger claim to fair use.</p>
<p>We never asked for any money, nor intended to claim financial gain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: averagegirl</title>
		<link>http://wehateyourblog.com/we-hate-our-author-kasper-hausers-dad/#comment-284</link>
		<dc:creator>averagegirl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 06:05:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wehateyourblog.wordpress.com/?page_id=15#comment-284</guid>
		<description>I hate the Gosford of James. And he knows it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hate the Gosford of James. And he knows it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
